Team ELO, Power6, lineup strength, and roster details unlock automatically as soon as real 2026 match data is available.
Record
1-0
Recent form
W (7-0)
Trend: Hot
Match tiebreaks
-
Average margin
7-0
Based on 1 scored duals
Game win %
89.6%
#2
60 of 67 games won
#2 of 10 ranked teams
Set win %
100.0%
#2
10 of 10 sets won
#2 of 10 ranked teams
Scored duals
1
Matches with publishable varsity result data
Rated roster
11
Out of 17 rostered players
Grade 12 / 1S
ELO 11.20
Rank #4
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR 5.xx
Rank #4
WTN 29.00
Rank #9
100%
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 12 / 2S
ELO 11.10
Rank #9
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
Coaches vote
-
Overall strength
7.1 / 10
Lineup stability
High
100% slot repeat rate
Average score
7-0
Based on 1 scored duals
Average sets won
2.0
Per scored lineup row
Average games won
12.0
Per scored lineup row
1
duals
1S
6-0, 6-0
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / 3S
ELO 11.10
Rank #8
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR 1.xx
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
68%
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / 4S
ELO 11.10
Rank #10
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / 1D
ELO 11.20
Rank #7
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR 2.xx
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
48%
Grade 10 / 1D
ELO 11.20
Rank #8
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR 2.xx
Rank #8
WTN -
Rank -
100%
Grade 10 / 2D
ELO 11.10
Rank #32
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 11 / 2D
ELO 11.10
Rank #13
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / 3D
ELO 11.10
Rank #22
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / 3D
ELO 11.10
Rank #29
Match Win % 100.0%
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 10 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 11 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 11 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 12 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 11 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Grade 11 / -
ELO -
Rank -
Match Win % -
Singles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
Doubles
UTR -
Rank -
WTN -
Rank -
-
| Player | Grade | Slot | Singles UTR | Singles WTN | Singles Rel | Doubles UTR | Doubles WTN | Doubles Rel | ELO | ELO Rank | Match Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tegan Schott | 12 | 1S | 5.xx#4 | 29.00#9 | 100% | -- | -- | - | 11.20 | #4 | 100.0% |
| Isaac Capelli | 12 | 2S | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #9 | 100.0% |
| Eric Emineth | 10 | 3S | 1.xx- | -- | 68% | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #8 | 100.0% |
| Liam Klouda | 10 | 4S | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #10 | 100.0% |
| Isaac Smith | 10 | 1D | -- | -- | - | 2.xx- | -- | 48% | 11.20 | #7 | 100.0% |
| Samuel Murray | 10 | 1D | -- | -- | - | 2.xx#8 | -- | 100% | 11.20 | #8 | 100.0% |
| Korwin Bessinger | 10 | 2D | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #32 | 100.0% |
| Grant Niegelsen | 11 | 2D | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #13 | 100.0% |
| Charles Endrizzi | 10 | 3D | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #22 | 100.0% |
| Ethan Wert | 10 | 3D | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | 11.10 | #29 | 100.0% |
| Henry McGovern | 10 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Riley Servais | 10 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Owen Ludlow | 11 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Kobe Woald | 11 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Jaedan Silcox | 12 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Tyler Feuerhelm | 11 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
| Gabriel Rivera | 11 | - | -- | -- | - | -- | -- | - | - | - | - |
Match
Aquinas 7-0 Black River Falls
Apr 7, 2026 / Black River Falls vs. Aquinas
Aquinas Team ELO
111.30
Black River Falls Team ELO
-
ELO differential
-
1S
6-0, 6-0
Aquinas
Black River Falls
2S
6-1, 6-2
Aquinas
Black River Falls
3S
Unavailable
Aquinas
Black River Falls
4S
Unavailable
Aquinas
Black River Falls
1D
6-4, 6-0
Aquinas
Black River Falls
2D
6-0, 6-0
Aquinas
Black River Falls
3D
6-0, 6-0
Aquinas
Black River Falls
1 Singles
Tegan Schott
10.0 / 10
100.0% match win
2 Singles
Isaac Capelli
10.0 / 10
100.0% match win
3 Singles
Eric Emineth
0.0 / 10
100.0% match win
4 Singles
Liam Klouda
0.0 / 10
100.0% match win
1 Doubles
Samuel Murray / Isaac Smith
10.0 / 10
100.0% match win
2 Doubles
Grant Niegelsen / Korwin Bessinger
10.0 / 10
100.0% match win
3 Doubles
Charles Endrizzi / Ethan Wert
10.0 / 10
100.0% match win
Score
111.30
Team ELO rank
#2
Team ELO uses the 10 unique players from the most recent official varsity lineup. If any of those players are still missing a 2026 ELO, the score stays blank.
Tegan Schott
1S
11.20
2026 ELO
Isaac Capelli
2S
11.10
2026 ELO
Eric Emineth
3S
11.10
2026 ELO
Liam Klouda
4S
11.10
2026 ELO
Samuel Murray
1D
11.20
2026 ELO
Isaac Smith
1D
11.20
2026 ELO
Grant Niegelsen
2D
11.10
2026 ELO
Korwin Bessinger
2D
11.10
2026 ELO
Charles Endrizzi
3D
11.10
2026 ELO
Ethan Wert
3D
11.10
2026 ELO
Score
-
Power6 rank
-
Only players with 100% reliability in the role they actually played are counted. If fewer than six players meet that standard, the score stays blank.
Not enough fully reliable players are available to build a complete Power6.
7
lines
2S
6-1, 6-2
3S
Unavailable
4S
Unavailable
1D
6-4, 6-0
2D
6-0, 6-0
3D
6-0, 6-0